Browse: Home / SEC Shuts Down 20 Bogus S-1 Registration Statements

Menu

Skip to content

Brenda Hamilton Securities LawyerLogo

Going Public

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Blog
  • Contact

SEC Shuts Down 20 Bogus S-1 Registration Statements

Posted by Brenda Hamilton, Securities Attorney on March 1, 2014 in Blog Posts | 177 Views

Shell Company - Reverse Merger

On February 3, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) announced the filing of stop order proceedings against 20 purported mining companies for providing false information in their registration statements. Of the 20 registration statements, 18 were opined upon by the same attorney who is the subject of a pending SEC  proceeding. Forms S-1’s are often used as part of a going public transaction.  More than one year ago, Promotion Stock Secrets published a featured report in which it noted blazing red flags of fraud in the same 20 registration statements.

Promotion Stock Secrets noted that the business plans of the issuers were virtually identical and involving purported mining properties. The issuers had nominal or no revenues, nominal or no assets and limited cash on hand. They also shared common bad actors, including John Briner. The registration statements opined by Dalmy were filed within close proximity to one another; in several cases, on the same day. Promotion Stock Secrets pointed out 19 of the 20 issuers were formed on May 31, or June 1 of 2012 and; 16 filed registration statements during January 2013. The remaining 4 registrations were filed in November and December of 2012.

More than a year after the  Promotion Stock Secrets report, the SEC’s Enforcement Division took action.  According to the SEC, all of the companies are controlled by John Briner, a promoter who was the subject of a prior SEC enforcement action and was suspended from practicing as an attorney on behalf of any entity regulated by the SEC.  However, each registration statement falsely stated that management consisted of a different individual who controlled and solely governed the company.  The named individuals varied by company.

The SEC’s Enforcement Division and the agency’s Division of Corporation Finance collaborate to weed out false or materially misleading registration statements before they become effective.  The purpose of a stop order is to prevent the sale of privately held shares to the public under a registration statement that is materially misleading or deficient.  If a stop order is issued, no new shares can enter the market pursuant to that registration statement until the company has corrected the deficiencies or misleading information in the prospectus.

“By seeking stop orders, we can proactively protect investors from the harmful consequences of investing in companies with materially misleading and deficient offering documents,” said Andrew M. Calamari, director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office.  “These particular registration statements failed to give investors an accurate depiction of who is running the companies.”

The 20 companies that are the subjects of the stop order proceedings are:

Braxton Resources Inc.
Bonanza Resources Corp.
Canyon Minerals Inc.
CBL Resources Inc.
Chum Mining Group Inc.
Clearpoint Resources Inc.
Coronation Mining Corp.
Eclipse Resources Inc.
Gaspard Mining Inc.
Gold Camp Explorations Inc.
Goldstream Mining Inc.
Jewel Explorations Inc.
Kingman River Resources Inc.
La Paz Mining Corp.
Lost Hills Mining Inc.
PRWC Energy Inc.
Seaview Resources Inc.
Stone Boat Mining Corp.
Tuba City Gold Corp.
Yuma Resources Inc.

The SEC’s Division of Enforcement alleges that the companies also falsely stated that they had no material agreements with an undisclosed control person or promoter when in fact they did have such agreements with Briner.  The SEC’s Division of Enforcement alleges as well that some of these issuers obstructed the SEC staff and refused to permit examinations of their registration statements.

The SEC instituted the proceedings against the issuers pursuant to Section 8(d) of the Securities Act of 1933 to determine whether the Enforcement Division’s allegations are true, and to afford each issuer an opportunity to present affirmative defenses. The proceedings will determine whether a stop order should be issued suspending the effectiveness of the registration statement or statements.

For further information about this securities law blog post, please contact Brenda Hamilton, Securities Attorney at 101 Plaza Real S, Suite 202 N, Boca Raton Florida, (561) 416-8956, by email at info@securitieslawyer101.com or visit www.reversemergers101.com.   This securities law blog post is provided as a general informational service to clients and friends of Hamilton & Associates Law Group and should not be construed as, and does not constitute, legal and compliance advice on any specific matter, nor does this message create an attorney-client relationship. Please note that the prior results discussed herein do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Hamilton & Associates | Going Public
Brenda Hamilton, Securities Attorney
101 Plaza Real South, Suite 202 North
Boca Raton, Florida 33432
Telephone: (561) 416-8956
Facsimile: (561) 416-2855
www.Reversemergers101.com

Posted in Blog Posts | Tagged Brenda Hamilton, Enforcement Proceeding, Form S-1, Form S-1 Registration Statement, Go Public, Going Public, Private Placement, Public Shell, Registration Statement, Reverse Merger, Securities Law Blog

About the Author

Brenda Hamilton, Securities Attorney

Related Posts

Missing imageRoadmap for a Successful Direct Public Offering→

Missing imageReverse Mergers After Amended Form 15c-21→

Missing imageGoing Public: Myths and Misinformation about Reverse Mergers→

Missing imageWhy Form 10 Shells Are High Risk – Form 10 Reverse Mergers→

• Going Public Reverse Mergers

• Going Dark Reverse Mergers

• Reverse Merger Due Diligence

• Reverse Merger Disclosures

• The Public Shell Rules

• Red Flags in Reverse Mergers

• Receivership Shells

• Rule 419 Shells

• Form 10 Shells

• Disclaimer

Hamilton & Associates Law Group
101 Plaza Real South, Suite 201 S
Boca Raton Florida 33432
Phone: 561-416-8956
Fax: 561-416-2855
www.reversemergers101.com
www.securitieslawyer101.com
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • RSS Feed
  • Twitter
• Going Public Reverse Mergers

• Going Dark Reverse Mergers

• Reverse Merger Due Diligence

• Reverse Merger Disclosures

• The Public Shell Rules

• Red Flags in Reverse Mergers

• Receivership Shells

• Rule 419 Shells

• Form 10 Shells

• Disclaimer

  • Uplisting from OTC Markets to Nasdaq or NYSE
    Uplisting from the OTC Markets to Nasdaq or NYSE American represents a pivotal transition for emerging companies seeking greater liquidity,… Read more: Uplisting from OTC Markets to Nasdaq or NYSE
  • Texas Stock Exchange Nears Launch After SEC Approval — A New Challenger to NYSE and Nasdaq
    Published: October 6, 2025 In a landmark decision that could alter the balance of power in U.S. capital markets, the… Read more: Texas Stock Exchange Nears Launch After SEC Approval — A New Challenger to NYSE and Nasdaq
  • OTC Markets Direct – Bypassing the Sponsoring Market Maker Under SEC Rule 15c2-11
    In September 2021, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted amendments to Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11, reshaping how securities become… Read more: OTC Markets Direct – Bypassing the Sponsoring Market Maker Under SEC Rule 15c2-11
  • Uplisting from OTC Markets to Nasdaq or NYSE: The Uplisting Path and Compliance Milestones
    For many emerging public companies, the OTC Markets represent the first rung on the ladder toward accessing institutional capital. But… Read more: Uplisting from OTC Markets to Nasdaq or NYSE: The Uplisting Path and Compliance Milestones
  • Form S-1 vs. Form S-3: A Practitioner’s Guide to Eligibility, Disclosure, and Incorporation by Reference (2025)
    Form S-1 and Form S-3 are the two most common registration statements under the Securities Act of 1933. While both… Read more: Form S-1 vs. Form S-3: A Practitioner’s Guide to Eligibility, Disclosure, and Incorporation by Reference (2025)
Hamilton & Associates Law Group
101 Plaza Real South, Suite 201 S
Boca Raton Florida 33432
Phone: 561-416-8956
Fax: 561-416-2855
www.reversemergers101.com
www.securitieslawyer101.com

©2014 Hamilton & Associates Law Group

Menu